Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeWeecke Rush
$149
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $60 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Weecke Rush
Weecke $149
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Weecke Rush and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $60 below Weecke Rush. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
19%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weecke Rush
$149
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $60 lower.
Weecke Rush
~25 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weecke Rush
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Weecke Rush
$149
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Weecke Rush
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Weecke Rush
~25 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Weecke Rush
160°C - 240°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Weecke Rush
~0.3 grams
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
Weecke Rush
2300mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Power Adjustment
Weecke Rush
Precision Digital - 1°C increments
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
Weecke Rush
Stainless Steel
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Brand
Weecke Rush
Weecke
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Manufacturer
Weecke Rush
SOUTH REED TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
XMAX QOMO
TopGreen Technology Co
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Weecke Rush | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $149 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~25 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 160°C - 240°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.3 grams | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2300mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | — | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Precision Digital - 1°C increments | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Weecke | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Manufacturer | SOUTH REED TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Weecke Rush runs hybrid while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $149 for the Weecke Rush, about $60 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Weecke Rush takes ~25 seconds. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Weecke Rush uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Weecke Rush has the larger chamber at ~0.3 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Weecke Rush controls heat with precision digital - 1°c increments, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Weecke Rush gives you finer per-degree control.
Across the 21 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 17, an overlap of about 19%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.