Price (USD)
ViVANT DAbOX edgeViVANT DAbOX
$65
XMAX Starry V3
$100
ViVANT DAbOX is typically around $35 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
ViVANT DAbOX
ViVANT $65
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX $100
ViVANT DAbOX and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. ViVANT DAbOX is usually the lower-cost pick at $65, around $35 below XMAX Starry V3. ViVANT DAbOX has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
15%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
ViVANT DAbOX
$65
XMAX Starry V3
$100
ViVANT DAbOX is typically around $35 lower.
ViVANT DAbOX
10 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
ViVANT DAbOX has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
ViVANT DAbOX
Conduction
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
ViVANT DAbOX
$65
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Heat Up Time
ViVANT DAbOX
10 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
ViVANT DAbOX
N/A
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Chamber Capacity
ViVANT DAbOX
0.1g - 0.2g
XMAX Starry V3
0.3g
Battery Type
ViVANT DAbOX
Internal
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Capacity
ViVANT DAbOX
1500mAh
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Dimensions
ViVANT DAbOX
6.5 x 4.9 x 2.2 cm
XMAX Starry V3
11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm
Power Adjustment
ViVANT DAbOX
Fixed (40W)
XMAX Starry V3
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
ViVANT DAbOX
Glass
XMAX Starry V3
Ceramic
Brand
ViVANT DAbOX
ViVANT
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | ViVANT DAbOX | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 10 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.1g - 0.2g | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 1500mAh | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 6.5 x 4.9 x 2.2 cm | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | — | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Fixed (40W) | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | ViVANT | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | No |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | On-Demand | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the ViVANT DAbOX is ready in 10 seconds versus ~30 seconds on the XMAX Starry V3, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
ViVANT DAbOX is the cheaper option at $65 compared with $100 for the XMAX Starry V3, about $35 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
ViVANT DAbOX reaches session-ready temperature in 10 seconds, while the XMAX Starry V3 takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the ViVANT DAbOX, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
XMAX Starry V3 has the larger chamber at 0.3g, versus 0.1g - 0.2g on the ViVANT DAbOX. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX Starry V3 uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The ViVANT DAbOX has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
ViVANT DAbOX controls heat with fixed (40w), while the XMAX Starry V3 uses digital (precise). XMAX Starry V3 gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX Starry V3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the ViVANT DAbOX is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.