Price (USD)
ViVANT DAbOX edgeViVANT DAbOX
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
ViVANT DAbOX is typically around $24 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
ViVANT DAbOX
ViVANT $65
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
ViVANT DAbOX and XMAX QOMO are both concentrates / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. ViVANT DAbOX is usually the lower-cost pick at $65, around $24 below XMAX QOMO. ViVANT DAbOX has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
23%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
ViVANT DAbOX
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
ViVANT DAbOX is typically around $24 lower.
ViVANT DAbOX
10 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
ViVANT DAbOX has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
ViVANT DAbOX
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
ViVANT DAbOX
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heat Up Time
ViVANT DAbOX
10 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
ViVANT DAbOX
N/A
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
ViVANT DAbOX
0.1g - 0.2g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
ViVANT DAbOX
1500mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Charging
ViVANT DAbOX
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Dimensions
ViVANT DAbOX
6.5 x 4.9 x 2.2 cm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
ViVANT DAbOX
Fixed (40W)
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
ViVANT DAbOX
Glass
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Brand
ViVANT DAbOX
ViVANT
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | ViVANT DAbOX | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 10 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.1g - 0.2g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1500mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 6.5 x 4.9 x 2.2 cm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Fixed (40W) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | ViVANT | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Session Style | On-Demand | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 17 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
ViVANT DAbOX is the cheaper option at $65 compared with $89 for the XMAX QOMO, about $24 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
ViVANT DAbOX reaches session-ready temperature in 10 seconds, while the XMAX QOMO takes ~20 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the ViVANT DAbOX, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
ViVANT DAbOX lists a chamber capacity of 0.1g - 0.2g; the XMAX QOMO lists 0.15g.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
XMAX QOMO charges over USB-C; the ViVANT DAbOX uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 22 specs we line up, they share 5 and differ on 17, an overlap of about 23%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.