Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeVenty
$449
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $360 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Venty
Storz & Bickel $449
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Venty and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $360 below Venty. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Venty
$449
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $360 lower.
Venty
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Venty
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Venty
$449
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Venty
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Temperature Range
Venty
40°C - 210°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Venty
~0.3g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Venty
Internal Non-Swappable Lithium-Ion
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Charge Time
Venty
80% charge in 40 minutes
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Power Adjustment
Venty
Digital
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
Venty
Ceramic-Coated
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Brand
Venty
Storz & Bickel
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Country of Manufacture
Venty
Germany
XMAX QOMO
China
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Venty | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $449 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 40°C - 210°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.3g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal Non-Swappable Lithium-Ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 80% charge in 40 minutes | 1-2 Hours |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | — | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Width | 5.5cm | — |
| Height | 15.7cm | — |
| Depth | 3.7cm | — |
| Weight | 252g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic-Coated | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Storz & Bickel | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the Venty is $449, a gap of about $360 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $449 for the Venty, about $360 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Venty uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Venty has the larger chamber at ~0.3g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Heat-up times are very close: ~20 seconds on the Venty and ~20 seconds on the XMAX QOMO. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Venty controls heat with digital, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Venty gives you finer per-degree control.
Venty fully charges in 80% charge in 40 minutes, ahead of 1-2 Hours on the XMAX QOMO.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.