Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeVEAZY
$248
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $159 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
VEAZY
Storz & Bickel $248
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
VEAZY and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $159 below VEAZY. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
18%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
VEAZY
$248
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $159 lower.
VEAZY
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
VEAZY
Hybrid Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
VEAZY
$248
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
VEAZY
Hybrid Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
VEAZY
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
VEAZY
40°C - 210°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Battery Life
VEAZY
~40 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
VEAZY
~90 minutes
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
VEAZY
134x37x35mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
VEAZY
Digital
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
VEAZY
Ceramic-Coated
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Brand
VEAZY
Storz & Bickel
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | VEAZY | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $248 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 40°C - 210°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.15g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~40 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 134x37x35mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 134g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic-Coated | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Storz & Bickel | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the VEAZY is $248, a gap of about $159 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $248 for the VEAZY, about $159 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the VEAZY takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
VEAZY uses hybrid convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
VEAZY controls heat with digital, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. VEAZY gives you finer per-degree control.
VEAZY's spec sheet lists ~40 minutes; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
VEAZY covers 40°C - 210°C, a wider band than the XMAX QOMO at 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.