Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeUtillian 722
$170
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $120 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Utillian 722
XMAX V3 Nano
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Utillian 722 and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / convection vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $120 below Utillian 722. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
27
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Utillian 722
$170
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $120 lower.
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Utillian 722
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Utillian 722
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Utillian 722
$170
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
Utillian 722
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
Utillian 722
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
Utillian 722
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Utillian 722
2300mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Battery Life
Utillian 722
~60 minutes
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charging
Utillian 722
Micro-USB
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
Utillian 722
~2 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Utillian 722 | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $170 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 225°C | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 2300mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~60 minutes | — |
| Charging | Micro-USB | — |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 5 stage | — |
| Brand | Utillian | — |
| Capacity | <0.4 grams | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX V3 Nano sits at $50 while the Utillian 722 is $170, a gap of about $120 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $170 for the Utillian 722, about $120 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of ~2 hours on the Utillian 722.
Utillian 722 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.