Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeUtillian 722
$170
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $81 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Utillian 722
XMAX QOMO
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Utillian 722 and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $81 below Utillian 722. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
13
Different Specs
13
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Utillian 722
$170
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $81 lower.
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Utillian 722
Convection
XMAX QOMO
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Utillian 722
$170
XMAX QOMO
$89
Device Type
Utillian 722
Portable
XMAX QOMO
—
Heating Type
Utillian 722
Convection
XMAX QOMO
—
Heat Up Time
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Battery Capacity
Utillian 722
2300mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Utillian 722
~60 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Utillian 722
Micro-USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Utillian 722
~2 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Power Adjustment
Utillian 722
Modular - 5 stage
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Utillian 722 | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $170 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 225°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Battery Capacity | 2300mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~60 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro-USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 5 stage | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Brand | Utillian | — |
| Capacity | <0.4 grams | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 13 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $170 for the Utillian 722, about $81 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Utillian 722 takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of ~2 hours on the Utillian 722.
Utillian 722 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Utillian 722's spec sheet lists ~60 minutes; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
XMAX QOMO covers 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F), a wider band than the Utillian 722 at 180°C - 225°C. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.