Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeUtillian 722
$170
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $81 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Utillian 722 vs XMAX QOMO
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Utillian 722
Utillian $170
VS
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Editorial Summary
Utillian 722 and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $81 below Utillian 722. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
XMAX QOMO edgeUtillian 722
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Heating Style
Close callUtillian 722
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Utillian 722
$170
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Utillian 722
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Utillian 722
<0.4 grams
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
Utillian 722
2300mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Utillian 722
~60 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Utillian 722
Micro-USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Utillian 722
~2 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Utillian 722
111x58x28mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Choose Utillian 722 if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward convection and discrete sessions.
- You prefer Utillian 722's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose XMAX QOMO if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($89 vs $170).
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget and concentrates sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
19 differ 3 shared
| Specification | Utillian 722 | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $170 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 225°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | <0.4 grams | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2300mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~60 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro-USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 111x58x28mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 180g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 5 stage | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Utillian | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Utillian 722 and the XMAX QOMO?
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Utillian 722 runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Which is cheaper, the Utillian 722 or the XMAX QOMO?
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $170 for the Utillian 722, about $81 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the Utillian 722 or the XMAX QOMO?
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Utillian 722 takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the Utillian 722 and the XMAX QOMO?
Utillian 722 uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Does the Utillian 722 or the XMAX QOMO hold more flower?
Utillian 722 has the larger chamber at <0.4 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Which charges faster, the Utillian 722 or the XMAX QOMO?
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of ~2 hours on the Utillian 722.
Which is more discreet, the Utillian 722 or the XMAX QOMO?
Utillian 722 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.