Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeTempest 2
$179
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $129 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Tempest 2 and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / convection vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $129 below Tempest 2. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
29
Different Specs
29
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Tempest 2
$179
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $129 lower.
Tempest 2
46g
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Tempest 2
Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Tempest 2
$179
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
Tempest 2
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
Tempest 2
Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
Tempest 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
Tempest 2
0.1g - 0.2g (adjustable)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Battery Type
Tempest 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Tempest 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charge Time
Tempest 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Dimensions
Tempest 2
122mm x 18.5mm
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Width
Tempest 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (29 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | Tempest 2 | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $179 | $50 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix | — |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | 0.1g - 0.2g (adjustable) | — |
| Battery Type diff | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity diff | — | 1000mAh |
| Charge Time diff | — | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions diff | 122mm x 18.5mm | — |
| Width diff | — | 2cm |
| Height diff | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight diff | 46g | 50g |
| Brand diff | Mad Heaters | — |
| Batteries diff | None | — |
| Capacity diff | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Country Of Manufacture diff | United Kingdom | — |
| Display Type diff | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Heating Time diff | ~30-45 seconds with torch | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Materials diff | Grade 5 titanium, aluminum heat shield, stainless steel | — |
| Name diff | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time diff | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time diff | — | 3 minutes |
| Temperature Control diff | Visual gauge with click indicators | — |
| Thickness diff | — | 2cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Neither is universally better. Tempest 2 fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Nano fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with Tempest 2 ($179), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.