Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeTempest 2
$179
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $90 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Tempest 2
Mad Heaters $179
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Tempest 2 and XMAX QOMO are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $90 below Tempest 2. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Tempest 2
$179
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $90 lower.
Tempest 2
~30-45 seconds with torch
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Tempest 2
Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Tempest 2
$179
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Tempest 2
Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Tempest 2
~30-45 seconds with torch
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Tempest 2
N/A
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Tempest 2
0.1g - 0.2g (adjustable)
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Tempest 2
None
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
Tempest 2
N/A
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Tempest 2
N/A
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Tempest 2
N/A
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Tempest 2
N/A
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Tempest 2 | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $179 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30-45 seconds with torch | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.1g - 0.2g (adjustable) | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | N/A | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 122mm x 18.5mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 46g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Visual gauge with click indicators | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Titanium | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Mad Heaters | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Body Material | Grade 5 titanium, aluminum heat shield, stainless steel | — |
| Country of Manufacture | Made in China, Assembled in the UK | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Tempest 2 runs convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $179 for the Tempest 2, about $90 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Tempest 2 takes ~30-45 seconds with torch. That's roughly 18 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Tempest 2 uses convection-heavy with thermal ball matrix heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Tempest 2 controls heat with visual gauge with click indicators, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Tempest 2 lists a chamber capacity of 0.1g - 0.2g (adjustable); the XMAX QOMO lists 0.15g.
Tempest 2's spec sheet lists N/A; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.