Price (USD)
XMAX Daboo edgeSilver Surfer Vaporizer
$270
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $221 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
7th Floor Vapes $270
XMAX Daboo
XMAX $49
Silver Surfer Vaporizer and XMAX Daboo are both concentrates / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Daboo is usually the lower-cost pick at $49, around $221 below Silver Surfer Vaporizer. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
$270
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $221 lower.
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
1.59 kg
XMAX Daboo
~231g
XMAX Daboo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
$270
XMAX Daboo
$49
Device Type
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
Desktop
XMAX Daboo
Portable
Chamber Capacity
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
0.50g
XMAX Daboo
N/A
Battery Type
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
N/A
XMAX Daboo
Internal
Charging
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
N/A
XMAX Daboo
USB-C
Dimensions
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
235x229x171mm
XMAX Daboo
166.5x38.5x22mm
Weight
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
1.59 kg
XMAX Daboo
~231g
Power Adjustment
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
Single Dial
XMAX Daboo
Modular - 3 Stages
Brand
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
7th Floor Vapes
XMAX Daboo
XMAX
Country of Manufacture
Silver Surfer Vaporizer
United States (USA)
XMAX Daboo
China
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Silver Surfer Vaporizer | XMAX Daboo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $270 | $49 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Temperature Range | — | 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.50g | N/A |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 650mAh |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~1 Hour |
| Dimensions | 235x229x171mm | 166.5x38.5x22mm |
| Weight | 1.59 kg | ~231g |
| Power Adjustment | Single Dial | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | 7th Floor Vapes | XMAX |
| 510 Compatible | — | Yes |
| Cartridge Resistance Support | — | 0.5-2.0Ω |
| Coil Type | — | Porous Quartz Coil |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Operating Voltage | — | 3.3-4.2V |
| Recommended Charger | — | 5V/1A |
| Release Date | 2004 | — |
| Session Style | — | Both |
| Warranty | 3 years | 6 months |
| Water Filtration | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Daboo sits at $49 while the Silver Surfer Vaporizer is $270, a gap of about $221 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Daboo is the cheaper option at $49 compared with $270 for the Silver Surfer Vaporizer, about $221 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Daboo is the lighter unit at ~231g, around 1359g less than the Silver Surfer Vaporizer at 1.59 kg. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
XMAX Daboo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Silver Surfer Vaporizer is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Silver Surfer Vaporizer lists a chamber capacity of 0.50g; the XMAX Daboo lists N/A.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.