Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeRiO
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $100 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
RiO
Stache $150
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX $50
RiO and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $100 below RiO. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
7%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
RiO
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $100 lower.
RiO
~522g
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
RiO
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
RiO
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Heating Type
RiO
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Temperature Range
RiO
N/A
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
RiO
N/A
XMAX V3 Nano
~0.1g
Battery Type
RiO
N/A
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Charging
RiO
N/A
XMAX V3 Nano
USB-C
Height
RiO
14 inches
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
Weight
RiO
~522g
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Power Adjustment
RiO
Manual
XMAX V3 Nano
None (fixed preset)
Chamber Material
RiO
Glass
XMAX V3 Nano
Stainless steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | RiO | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $150 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | ~0.1g |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~50 minutes |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | 14 inches | 13.5cm |
| Weight | ~522g | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | None (fixed preset) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Stainless steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Stache | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Session Timer | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX V3 Nano sits at $50 while the RiO is $150, a gap of about $100 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $150 for the RiO, about $100 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
RiO uses conduction heating, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses hybrid (primarily convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter unit at 50g, around 472g less than the RiO at ~522g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
RiO controls heat with manual, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses none (fixed preset). Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
RiO lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the XMAX V3 Nano lists ~0.1g.
RiO is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.