Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgePuffco Plus
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $50 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Puffco Plus
Puffco $100
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX $50
Puffco Plus and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $50 below Puffco Plus. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
28
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
7%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Puffco Plus
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $50 lower.
Puffco Plus
~91g
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Puffco Plus
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Temperature Range
Puffco Plus
580°F - 720°F (304°C - 382°C)
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
Puffco Plus
0.3g
XMAX V3 Nano
~0.1g
Battery Type
Puffco Plus
Internal
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Puffco Plus
520mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Battery Life
Puffco Plus
~6 uses
XMAX V3 Nano
5-6 sessions
Charging
Puffco Plus
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
USB-C
Charge Time
Puffco Plus
1-2 Hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Weight
Puffco Plus
~91g
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Power Adjustment
Puffco Plus
Modular - 3 Stages
XMAX V3 Nano
None (fixed preset)
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Puffco Plus | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 580°F - 720°F (304°C - 382°C) | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3g | ~0.1g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 520mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~6 uses | 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1-2 Hours | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions | 14 x 131mm | — |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | ~91g | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 3 Stages | None (fixed preset) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Stainless steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Puffco | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2023 |
| Session Style | Both | Session |
| Session Timer | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 26 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $100 for the Puffco Plus, about $50 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Puffco Plus has the larger chamber at 0.3g, versus ~0.1g on the XMAX V3 Nano. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter unit at 50g, around 41g less than the Puffco Plus at ~91g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of 1-2 Hours on the Puffco Plus.
Puffco Plus is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Puffco Plus's spec sheet lists ~6 uses; the XMAX V3 Nano lists 5-6 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.