Price (USD)
Close callPOTV ONE
$100
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
POTV ONE
Planet of the Vapes $100
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
POTV ONE and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($100 vs $89). XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
POTV ONE
$100
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
POTV ONE
30-40 Seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
POTV ONE
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
POTV ONE
$100
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
POTV ONE
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
POTV ONE
30-40 Seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
POTV ONE
160-221°C (320-430°F)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
POTV ONE
0.10g - 0.15g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
POTV ONE
1600mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
POTV ONE
30-40 Minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
POTV ONE
Micro-USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
POTV ONE
~90 Minutes
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
POTV ONE
8.1x5x2.7cm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | POTV ONE | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 30-40 Seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 160-221°C (320-430°F) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.10g - 0.15g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1600mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | 30-40 Minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro-USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~90 Minutes | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 8.1x5x2.7cm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | ~130 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Titanium | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Planet of the Vapes | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: POTV ONE runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the POTV ONE takes 30-40 Seconds. That's roughly 15 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
POTV ONE uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $100 for the POTV ONE versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
POTV ONE controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. POTV ONE gives you finer per-degree control.
POTV ONE lists a chamber capacity of 0.10g - 0.15g; the XMAX QOMO lists 0.15g.
POTV ONE's spec sheet lists 30-40 Minutes; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.