Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgePAX FLOW
$350
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $300 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
PAX FLOW and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $300 below PAX FLOW. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
28
Different Specs
28
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
PAX FLOW
$350
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $300 lower.
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
PAX FLOW
135 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX FLOW
$350
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
PAX FLOW
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
PAX FLOW
180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F)
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
PAX FLOW
0.25g - 0.35g
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Battery Type
PAX FLOW
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
PAX FLOW
2000mAh (internal)
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charge Time
PAX FLOW
~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C)
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Dimensions
PAX FLOW
107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (28 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | PAX FLOW | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $350 | $50 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (conduction + convection) | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | 30-45 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | 180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F) | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | 0.25g - 0.35g | — |
| Battery Type diff | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 2000mAh (internal) | 1000mAh |
| Charge Time diff | ~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C) | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions diff | 107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm | — |
| Width diff | — | 2cm |
| Height diff | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight diff | 135 grams | 50g |
| Power Adjustment diff | Five petal modes + Bong Mode | — |
| Brand diff | PAX Labs | — |
| Capacity diff | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Display Type diff | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Heating Time diff | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name diff | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time diff | About 5-7 sessions per charge | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Length diff | 8-minute timer | — |
| Session Time diff | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness diff | — | 2cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Neither is universally better. PAX FLOW fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Nano fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with PAX FLOW ($350), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.