Price (USD)
Utillian 722 edgePAX 3
$250
Utillian 722
$170
Utillian 722 is typically around $80 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
PAX 3
Utillian 722
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
PAX 3 and Utillian 722 are both portable / discrete vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Utillian 722 is usually the lower-cost pick at $170, around $80 below PAX 3. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
16
Different Specs
14
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
PAX 3
$250
Utillian 722
$170
Utillian 722 is typically around $80 lower.
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
PAX 3
~93 grams
Utillian 722
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
PAX 3
Conduction
Utillian 722
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX 3
$250
Utillian 722
$170
Heating Type
PAX 3
Conduction
Utillian 722
Convection
Temperature Range
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
Chamber Capacity
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Utillian 722
—
Battery Capacity
PAX 3
3500mAh
Utillian 722
2300mAh
Battery Life
PAX 3
—
Utillian 722
~60 minutes
Charging
PAX 3
—
Utillian 722
Micro-USB
Charge Time
PAX 3
~90 minutes
Utillian 722
~2 hours
Bluetooth / App
PAX 3
Yes
Utillian 722
—
Dimensions
PAX 3
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Utillian 722
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | PAX 3 | Utillian 722 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $170 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) | 180°C - 225°C |
| Chamber Capacity | <0.35 grams | — |
| Battery Capacity | 3500mAh | 2300mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | — | Micro-USB |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | ~2 hours |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | — |
| Weight | ~93 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 stages | Modular - 5 stage |
| Brand | PAX Labs | Utillian |
| Capacity | — | <0.4 grams |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: PAX 3 runs conduction while Utillian 722 runs convection. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Utillian 722 is the cheaper option at $170 compared with $250 for the PAX 3, about $80 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
PAX 3 uses conduction heating, while the Utillian 722 uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Only the PAX 3 pairs with a companion app. The Utillian 722 relies entirely on its on-device controls.
Heat-up times are very close: <30 seconds on the PAX 3 and ~30 seconds on the Utillian 722. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
PAX 3 fully charges in ~90 minutes, ahead of ~2 hours on the Utillian 722.
PAX 3 covers 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F), a wider band than the Utillian 722 at 180°C - 225°C. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.