Price (USD)
PAX 2 edgePAX 2
$150
Utillian 722
$170
PAX 2 is typically around $20 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
PAX 2 vs Utillian 722
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
PAX 2
PAX Labs $150
VS
Utillian 722
Utillian $170
Editorial Summary
PAX 2 and Utillian 722 are both portable / discrete vaporizers, but they target different priorities. PAX 2 is usually the lower-cost pick at $150, around $20 below Utillian 722. Utillian 722 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
15%
Shared Traits
Portable Discrete Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Utillian 722 edgePAX 2
<60 seconds
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
Utillian 722 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Weight
PAX 2 edgePAX 2
~90 grams
Utillian 722
180g
PAX 2 is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close callPAX 2
Conduction
Utillian 722
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX 2
$150
Utillian 722
$170
Heating Type
PAX 2
Conduction
Utillian 722
Convection
Heat Up Time
PAX 2
<60 seconds
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
PAX 2
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
Chamber Capacity
PAX 2
0.15 - 0.35 grams
Utillian 722
<0.4 grams
Battery Capacity
PAX 2
3000mAh
Utillian 722
2300mAh
Dimensions
PAX 2
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Utillian 722
111x58x28mm
Weight
PAX 2
~90 grams
Utillian 722
180g
Power Adjustment
PAX 2
4 Preset Modes
Utillian 722
Modular - 5 stage
Brand
PAX 2
PAX Labs
Utillian 722
Utillian
Choose PAX 2 if...
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction sessions.
Choose Utillian 722 if...
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward convection sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
17 differ 3 shared
| Specification | PAX 2 | Utillian 722 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $150 | $170 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | <60 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) | 180°C - 225°C |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15 - 0.35 grams | <0.4 grams |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 3000mAh | 2300mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | — | Micro-USB |
| Charge Time | — | ~2 hours |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | 111x58x28mm |
| Weight | ~90 grams | 180g |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | Modular - 5 stage |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Brand | PAX Labs | Utillian |
| Release Date | 2015 | — |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the PAX 2 and the Utillian 722?
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: PAX 2 runs conduction while Utillian 722 runs convection. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Which is cheaper, the PAX 2 or the Utillian 722?
PAX 2 is the cheaper option at $150 compared with $170 for the Utillian 722, about $20 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the PAX 2 or the Utillian 722?
Utillian 722 reaches session-ready temperature in ~30 seconds, while the PAX 2 takes <60 seconds. That's roughly 30 seconds quicker on the Utillian 722, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the PAX 2 and the Utillian 722?
PAX 2 uses conduction heating, while the Utillian 722 uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Does the PAX 2 or the Utillian 722 hold more flower?
Utillian 722 has the larger chamber at <0.4 grams, versus 0.15 - 0.35 grams on the PAX 2. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Which is lighter, the PAX 2 or the Utillian 722?
PAX 2 is the lighter unit at ~90 grams, around 90g less than the Utillian 722 at 180g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
How similar are the PAX 2 and the Utillian 722?
Across the 20 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 17, an overlap of about 15%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.