Price (USD)
Ruby Wireless edgeModul
$350
Ruby Wireless
$255
Ruby Wireless is typically around $95 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Modul vs Ruby Wireless
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Modul
Stündenglass $350
VS
Ruby Wireless
SZ Crossing $254.99
Editorial Summary
Modul and Ruby Wireless are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Ruby Wireless is usually the lower-cost pick at $255, around $95 below Modul. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heating Style
Close callModul
Conduction
Ruby Wireless
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Modul
$350
Ruby Wireless
$255
Device Type
Modul
Portable
Ruby Wireless
Desktop
Heating Type
Modul
Conduction
Ruby Wireless
Convection
Temperature Range
Modul
850°F-900°F (Dry Herb Tank)
Ruby Wireless
510F - 560F (Suggested)
Battery Type
Modul
Internal
Ruby Wireless
N/A
Charging
Modul
USB-C
Ruby Wireless
N/A
Power Adjustment
Modul
Digital
Ruby Wireless
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Modul
Quartz
Ruby Wireless
Titanium
Body Material
Modul
Anodized Aluminum
Ruby Wireless
Not specified
Choose Modul if...
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and portable sessions.
- You prefer Modul's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose Ruby Wireless if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($255 vs $350).
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
26 differ 0 shared
| Specification | Modul | Ruby Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $350 | $255 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | ~15 Seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 850°F-900°F (Dry Herb Tank) | 510F - 560F (Suggested) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Internal | N/A |
| Battery Capacity | 6000mAh | — |
| Battery Life | <50 Sessions Depending on Usage Style | — |
| Charging | USB-C | N/A |
| Charge Time | ~2 Hours | — |
| Dimensions | 154x68x50mm | — |
| Weight | 387.5g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Titanium |
| Brand | — | SZ Crossing |
| Ball Type | — | 520 gem-cut rubies |
| Body Material | Anodized Aluminum | Not specified |
| Coil Size | — | 25mm coaxial |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Display Type | 2.4” Color Display | — |
| Joint Size | — | 14.4mm and 18.8mm male |
| Power | — | Classic PID controller with dock |
| Release Date | 2023 | — |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Modul and the Ruby Wireless?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Modul is a portable, Ruby Wireless is a desktop. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which is cheaper, the Modul or the Ruby Wireless?
Ruby Wireless is the cheaper option at $255 compared with $350 for the Modul, about $95 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
What's the difference in heating between the Modul and the Ruby Wireless?
Modul uses conduction heating, while the Ruby Wireless uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Is the Modul or the Ruby Wireless better for home versus on-the-go use?
Modul is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Ruby Wireless is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.