Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeMedivape Ultra
$90
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $40 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Medivape Ultra
Medivape $90
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX $50
Medivape Ultra and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $40 below Medivape Ultra. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Medivape Ultra
$90
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $40 lower.
Medivape Ultra
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Medivape Ultra
$90
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Heating Type
Medivape Ultra
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Temperature Range
Medivape Ultra
180°C - 224°C
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
Medivape Ultra
Internal
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Medivape Ultra
1500mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
Medivape Ultra
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
USB-C
Power Adjustment
Medivape Ultra
Modular - 5 Stages
XMAX V3 Nano
None (fixed preset)
Chamber Material
Medivape Ultra
Ceramic
XMAX V3 Nano
Stainless steel
Brand
Medivape Ultra
Medivape
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Medivape Ultra | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 224°C | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | ~0.1g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 1500mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~50 minutes |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 5 Stages | None (fixed preset) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Stainless steel |
| Brand | Medivape | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Session Timer | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Medivape Ultra runs convection while XMAX V3 Nano runs hybrid (primarily convection). That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $90 for the Medivape Ultra, about $40 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Medivape Ultra uses convection heating, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses hybrid (primarily convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Medivape Ultra is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX V3 Nano charges over USB-C; the Medivape Ultra uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 26 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 24, an overlap of about 8%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.