Price (USD)
Close callMedivape Ultra
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Medivape Ultra
Medivape $90
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Medivape Ultra and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($90 vs $89). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
16
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
20%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Medivape Ultra
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Medivape Ultra
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Medivape Ultra
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Medivape Ultra
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Temperature Range
Medivape Ultra
180°C - 224°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Battery Capacity
Medivape Ultra
1500mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Charging
Medivape Ultra
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Power Adjustment
Medivape Ultra
Modular - 5 Stages
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Brand
Medivape Ultra
Medivape
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Medivape Ultra | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 224°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1500mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | — | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 5 Stages | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Medivape | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Medivape Ultra runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Medivape Ultra uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $90 for the Medivape Ultra versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Medivape Ultra is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX QOMO covers 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F), a wider band than the Medivape Ultra at 180°C - 224°C. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
XMAX QOMO charges over USB-C; the Medivape Ultra uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 20 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 16, an overlap of about 20%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.