Price (USD)
XMAX OONT edgeMedivape Ultra
$90
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $40 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Medivape Ultra vs XMAX OONT
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Medivape Ultra
Medivape $90
VS
XMAX OONT
XMAX $50
Editorial Summary
Medivape Ultra and XMAX OONT are both portable / discrete vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX OONT is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $40 below Medivape Ultra. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
15
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
25%
Shared Traits
Portable Discrete Budget Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heating Style
Close callMedivape Ultra
Convection
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Medivape Ultra
$90
XMAX OONT
$50
Heating Type
Medivape Ultra
Convection
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Temperature Range
Medivape Ultra
180°C - 220°C
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
Battery Type
Medivape Ultra
Internal
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
Power Adjustment
Medivape Ultra
Modular - 5 Stages
XMAX OONT
5 Preset Modes
Brand
Medivape Ultra
Medivape
XMAX OONT
XMAX
Choose Medivape Ultra if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward convection sessions.
- You prefer Medivape Ultra's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose XMAX OONT if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($50 vs $90).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
15 differ 5 shared
| Specification | Medivape Ultra | XMAX OONT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 220°C | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal 18500 |
| Battery Capacity | 1500mAh | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 12+ sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | — | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 5 Stages | 5 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Brand | Medivape | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | No |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Medivape Ultra and the XMAX OONT?
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Medivape Ultra runs convection while XMAX OONT runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Which is cheaper, the Medivape Ultra or the XMAX OONT?
XMAX OONT is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $90 for the Medivape Ultra, about $40 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
What's the difference in heating between the Medivape Ultra and the XMAX OONT?
Medivape Ultra uses convection heating, while the XMAX OONT uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
How similar are the Medivape Ultra and the XMAX OONT?
Across the 20 specs we line up, they share 5 and differ on 15, an overlap of about 25%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.