Price (USD)
Close callLinx Hypnos Zero
$80
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Hypnos Zero
Linx Vapor $80
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Linx Hypnos Zero and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($80 vs $89). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
6
Overall Overlap
25%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Hypnos Zero
$80
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Linx Hypnos Zero
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Hypnos Zero
$80
XMAX QOMO
$89
Chamber Capacity
Linx Hypnos Zero
~0.1 gram
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Linx Hypnos Zero
Removable 510-thread
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
Linx Hypnos Zero
650mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Charging
Linx Hypnos Zero
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Power Adjustment
Linx Hypnos Zero
Modular Control - 4 stages
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Brand
Linx Hypnos Zero
Linx Vapor
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Release Date
Linx Hypnos Zero
2017
XMAX QOMO
2020
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Hypnos Zero | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $80 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.1 gram | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Removable 510-thread | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 650mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1-2 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | — | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Height | 10cm | — |
| Weight | 46g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular Control - 4 stages | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
| Session Style | On-Demand | — |
| Thread Type | 510 Thread | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 18 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX QOMO has the larger chamber at 0.15g, versus ~0.1 gram on the Linx Hypnos Zero. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $80 for the Linx Hypnos Zero versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Linx Hypnos Zero uses removable 510-thread, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Linx Hypnos Zero is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
XMAX QOMO charges over USB-C; the Linx Hypnos Zero uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.