Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeLinx Gaia
$160
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $71 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Gaia
Linx Vapor $160
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Linx Gaia and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $71 below Linx Gaia. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Gaia
$160
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $71 lower.
Linx Gaia
Primarily Convection with some Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Gaia
$160
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Linx Gaia
Primarily Convection with some Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Temperature Range
Linx Gaia
93°C - 220°C (200°F-428°F)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Gaia
0.25g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
Linx Gaia
2200mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Linx Gaia
~2 hours
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Linx Gaia
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Linx Gaia
3 - 4 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Linx Gaia
50 x 24 x 80mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
Linx Gaia
Digital (precise)
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Gaia | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $160 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Primarily Convection with some Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 93°C - 220°C (200°F-428°F) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.25g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2200mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~2 hours | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 50 x 24 x 80mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 146 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | OLED | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Linx Gaia runs primarily convection with some conduction while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $160 for the Linx Gaia, about $71 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Gaia uses primarily convection with some conduction heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Linx Gaia has the larger chamber at 0.25g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Linx Gaia controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Linx Gaia gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Gaia.
Linx Gaia's spec sheet lists ~2 hours; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.