Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeLinx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $50 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Eden
XMAX V3 Nano
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Eden and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $50 below Linx Eden. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $50 lower.
Linx Eden
116 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Heating Type
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
—
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
Linx Eden
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Linx Eden
2500mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
Linx Eden
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
Linx Eden
3 - 4 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Dimensions
Linx Eden
24 x 130mm
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Width
Linx Eden
—
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
Height
Linx Eden
—
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Eden | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $50 |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Temperature Range | — | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging | Micro USB | — |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | — |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | 116 grams | 50g |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | — |
| Capacity | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 24 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $100 for the Linx Eden, about $50 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter unit at 50g, around 66g less than the Linx Eden at 116 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Eden.
Linx Eden is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.