Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeLinx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $50 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX $50
Linx Eden and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $50 below Linx Eden. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
7%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $50 lower.
Linx Eden
116 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Heating Type
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Eden
0.15g - 0.25g
XMAX V3 Nano
~0.1g
Battery Type
Linx Eden
Internal
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Linx Eden
2500mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
Linx Eden
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
USB-C
Charge Time
Linx Eden
3 - 4 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Weight
Linx Eden
116 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Power Adjustment
Linx Eden
4 Preset Modes
XMAX V3 Nano
None (fixed preset)
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Eden | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g - 0.25g | ~0.1g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | — |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | 116 grams | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | None (fixed preset) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic & Quartz | Stainless steel |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Session Timer | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Linx Eden runs convection while XMAX V3 Nano runs hybrid (primarily convection). That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $100 for the Linx Eden, about $50 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Eden uses convection heating, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses hybrid (primarily convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Linx Eden has the larger chamber at 0.15g - 0.25g, versus ~0.1g on the XMAX V3 Nano. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter unit at 50g, around 66g less than the Linx Eden at 116 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Eden.
Linx Eden is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.