Price (USD)
Close callLinx Eden
$100
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Linx Eden and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($100 vs $89). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Eden
0.15g - 0.25g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
Linx Eden
2500mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Charging
Linx Eden
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Linx Eden
3 - 4 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Linx Eden
24 x 130mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
Linx Eden
4 Preset Modes
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
Linx Eden
Ceramic & Quartz
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Eden | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g - 0.25g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 116 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic & Quartz | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Linx Eden runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Linx Eden uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Linx Eden has the larger chamber at 0.15g - 0.25g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $100 for the Linx Eden versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Eden.
Linx Eden is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX QOMO charges over USB-C; the Linx Eden uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.