Price (USD)
Close callLinx Eden
$100
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Eden vs XMAX QOMO
Linx Eden
VS
XMAX QOMO
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
Linx Eden and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($100 vs $89). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
13
Different Specs
13
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Portable Budget Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close callLinx Eden
—
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Close callLinx Eden
116 grams
XMAX QOMO
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close callLinx Eden
Convection
XMAX QOMO
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
vs
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Linx Eden
Convection
vs
XMAX QOMO
—
Heat Up Time
Linx Eden
—
vs
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
—
vs
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Battery Capacity
Linx Eden
2500mAh
vs
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Linx Eden
—
vs
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Linx Eden
Micro USB
vs
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Linx Eden
3 - 4 hours
vs
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Linx Eden
24 x 130mm
vs
XMAX QOMO
—
Weight
Linx Eden
116 grams
vs
XMAX QOMO
—
Choose Linx Eden if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward discrete and convection sessions.
- You prefer Linx Eden's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose XMAX QOMO if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates and conduction sessions.
- You prefer XMAX QOMO's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
13 differ 0 shared
| Specification | Linx Eden | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $89 |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | — |
| Weight | 116 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | — | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Eden and the XMAX QOMO?
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 13 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Eden or the XMAX QOMO?
Listed prices are close: $100 for the Linx Eden versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Which charges faster, the Linx Eden or the XMAX QOMO?
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Eden.
Which is more discreet, the Linx Eden or the XMAX QOMO?
Linx Eden is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Which uses USB-C, the Linx Eden or the XMAX QOMO?
XMAX QOMO charges over USB-C; the Linx Eden uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.