Price (USD)
XMAX OONT edgeLinx Eden
$100
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $50 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
XMAX OONT
XMAX $50
Linx Eden and XMAX OONT are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX OONT is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $50 below Linx Eden. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $50 lower.
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX OONT
$50
Heating Type
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
Battery Type
Linx Eden
Internal
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
Battery Capacity
Linx Eden
2500mAh
XMAX OONT
1500mAh
Charging
Linx Eden
Micro USB
XMAX OONT
USB-C
Charge Time
Linx Eden
3 - 4 hours
XMAX OONT
~2 hours
Dimensions
Linx Eden
24 x 130mm
XMAX OONT
51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm
Power Adjustment
Linx Eden
4 Preset Modes
XMAX OONT
5 Preset Modes
Chamber Material
Linx Eden
Ceramic & Quartz
XMAX OONT
Stainless Steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Eden | XMAX OONT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g - 0.25g | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal 18500 |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 12+ sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm |
| Weight | 116 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | 5 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic & Quartz | Stainless Steel |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | No |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Linx Eden runs convection while XMAX OONT runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX OONT is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $100 for the Linx Eden, about $50 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Eden uses convection heating, while the XMAX OONT uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX OONT fully charges in ~2 hours, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Eden.
XMAX OONT charges over USB-C; the Linx Eden uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 22 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 20, an overlap of about 9%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.