Price (USD)
XMAX Daboo edgeLinx Eden
$100
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $51 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
XMAX Daboo
XMAX $49
Linx Eden and XMAX Daboo are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Daboo is usually the lower-cost pick at $49, around $51 below Linx Eden. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $51 lower.
Linx Eden
116 grams
XMAX Daboo
~231g
Linx Eden is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX Daboo
$49
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
XMAX Daboo
285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Eden
0.15g - 0.25g
XMAX Daboo
N/A
Battery Capacity
Linx Eden
2500mAh
XMAX Daboo
650mAh
Charging
Linx Eden
Micro USB
XMAX Daboo
USB-C
Charge Time
Linx Eden
3 - 4 hours
XMAX Daboo
~1 Hour
Dimensions
Linx Eden
24 x 130mm
XMAX Daboo
166.5x38.5x22mm
Weight
Linx Eden
116 grams
XMAX Daboo
~231g
Power Adjustment
Linx Eden
4 Preset Modes
XMAX Daboo
Modular - 3 Stages
Brand
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor
XMAX Daboo
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Eden | XMAX Daboo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $49 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) | 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g - 0.25g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 650mAh |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | ~1 Hour |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | 166.5x38.5x22mm |
| Weight | 116 grams | ~231g |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic & Quartz | — |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| 510 Compatible | — | Yes |
| Cartridge Resistance Support | — | 0.5-2.0Ω |
| Coil Type | — | Porous Quartz Coil |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Operating Voltage | — | 3.3-4.2V |
| Recommended Charger | — | 5V/1A |
| Release Date | 2019 | — |
| Session Style | — | Both |
| Warranty | 1 year | 6 months |
| Water Filtration | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is portability: the Linx Eden is roughly 115g lighter than the XMAX Daboo, which adds up over a day of pocket carry.
XMAX Daboo is the cheaper option at $49 compared with $100 for the Linx Eden, about $51 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Eden is the lighter unit at 116 grams, around 115g less than the XMAX Daboo at ~231g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Eden lists a chamber capacity of 0.15g - 0.25g; the XMAX Daboo lists N/A.
XMAX Daboo fully charges in ~1 Hour, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Eden.
Linx Eden is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Daboo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX Daboo charges over USB-C; the Linx Eden uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.