Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeLinx Apollo
$260
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $210 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Linx Apollo and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $210 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $210 lower.
Linx Apollo
150 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Width
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
Height
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (23 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $260 | $50 |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type diff | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 2600mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charge Time diff | — | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions diff | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Width diff | — | 2cm |
| Height diff | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight diff | 150 grams | 50g |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages | — |
| Brand diff | Linx Vapor | — |
| Capacity diff | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Display Type diff | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Heating Time diff | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name diff | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time diff | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time diff | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness diff | — | 2cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Neither is universally better. Linx Apollo fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Nano fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with Linx Apollo ($260), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.