Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeLinx Apollo
$260
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $171 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Linx Apollo and XMAX QOMO are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $171 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
18%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $171 lower.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX QOMO
$89
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $171 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $171 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the XMAX QOMO lists 0.15g.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Linx Apollo's spec sheet lists ~10 sessions; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
XMAX QOMO charges over USB-C; the Linx Apollo uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.