Price (USD)
XMAX OONT edgeLinx Apollo
$260
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $210 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
XMAX OONT
XMAX $50
Linx Apollo and XMAX OONT are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX OONT is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $210 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $210 lower.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX OONT
$50
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
XMAX OONT
1500mAh
Battery Life
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
XMAX OONT
12+ sessions
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
XMAX OONT
USB-C
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
XMAX OONT
~2 hours
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
XMAX OONT
51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
XMAX OONT
5 Preset Modes
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
XMAX OONT
Stainless Steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XMAX OONT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal 18500 |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | 12+ sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | 5 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | No |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX OONT sits at $50 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $210 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX OONT is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $210 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX OONT fully charges in ~2 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
XMAX OONT is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Linx Apollo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Linx Apollo's spec sheet lists ~10 sessions; the XMAX OONT lists 12+ sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
XMAX OONT charges over USB-C; the Linx Apollo uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 24 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 22, an overlap of about 8%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.