Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeLinx Apollo
$190
Ruby Wireless
$255
Linx Apollo is typically around $65 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs Ruby Wireless
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
VS
Ruby Wireless
SZ Crossing $254.99
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and Ruby Wireless are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $190, around $65 below Ruby Wireless. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$190
Ruby Wireless
$255
Device Type
Linx Apollo
Portable
Ruby Wireless
Desktop
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Ruby Wireless
510F - 560F (Suggested)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
Ruby Wireless
Not specified
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
Ruby Wireless
N/A
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Ruby Wireless
N/A
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Ruby Wireless
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Ruby Wireless
Titanium
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
Ruby Wireless
SZ Crossing
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($190 vs $255).
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
Choose Ruby Wireless if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
- You prefer Ruby Wireless's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
23 differ 0 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | Ruby Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $190 | $255 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | — | Convection |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 510F - 560F (Suggested) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Internal | N/A |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | — |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | N/A |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Titanium |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | SZ Crossing |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Ball Type | — | 520 gem-cut rubies |
| Body Material | — | Titanium |
| Coil Size | — | 25mm coaxial |
| Joint Size | — | 14.4mm and 18.8mm male |
| Power | — | Classic PID controller with dock |
| Warranty | 1 year | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the Ruby Wireless?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Linx Apollo is a portable, Ruby Wireless is a desktop. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Wireless?
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $190 compared with $255 for the Ruby Wireless, about $65 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Is the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Wireless better for home versus on-the-go use?
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Ruby Wireless is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Wireless?
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the Ruby Wireless uses digital (precise). Ruby Wireless gives you finer per-degree control.
How much flower do the Linx Apollo and Ruby Wireless hold?
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the Ruby Wireless lists Not specified.
Which has a wider temperature range, the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Wireless?
Linx Apollo covers 220°F - 428°F, a wider band than the Ruby Wireless at 510F - 560F (Suggested). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.