Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeLinx Apollo
$190
Ruby Wireless
$255
Linx Apollo is typically around $65 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs Ruby Wireless
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
VS
Ruby Wireless
SZ Crossing $254.99
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and Ruby Wireless are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $190, around $65 below Ruby Wireless. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$190
Ruby Wireless
$255
Device Type
Linx Apollo
Portable
Ruby Wireless
Desktop
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Ruby Wireless
510F - 560F (Suggested)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
Ruby Wireless
Not specified
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
Ruby Wireless
N/A
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Ruby Wireless
N/A
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Ruby Wireless
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Ruby Wireless
Titanium
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
Ruby Wireless
SZ Crossing
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($190 vs $255).
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
Typical price
$190
No stores listed yet
No discount code
Choose Ruby Wireless if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
- You prefer Ruby Wireless's overall feature mix and form factor.
Typical price
$254.99
Sold by The Stash Shack
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
23 differ 0 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | Ruby Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $190 | $255 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | — | Convection |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 510F - 560F (Suggested) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Internal | N/A |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | — |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | N/A |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Titanium |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | SZ Crossing |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Ball Type | — | 520 gem-cut rubies |
| Body Material | — | Titanium |
| Coil Size | — | 25mm coaxial |
| Joint Size | — | 14.4mm and 18.8mm male |
| Power | — | Classic PID controller with dock |
| Warranty | 1 year | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the Ruby Wireless?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Linx Apollo is a portable, Ruby Wireless is a desktop. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Wireless?
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $190 compared with $255 for the Ruby Wireless, about $65 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Is the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Wireless better for home versus on-the-go use?
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Ruby Wireless is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Wireless?
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the Ruby Wireless uses digital (precise). Ruby Wireless gives you finer per-degree control.
How much flower do the Linx Apollo and Ruby Wireless hold?
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the Ruby Wireless lists Not specified.
Which has a wider temperature range, the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Wireless?
Linx Apollo covers 220°F - 428°F, a wider band than the Ruby Wireless at 510F - 560F (Suggested). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.