Price (USD)
Ruby Twist edgeLinx Apollo
$260
Ruby Twist
$170
Ruby Twist is typically around $90 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs Ruby Twist
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
VS
Ruby Twist
SZ Crossing $169.99
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and Ruby Twist are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Ruby Twist is usually the lower-cost pick at $170, around $90 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weight
Linx Apollo edgeLinx Apollo
150 grams
Ruby Twist
0.8kg
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
Ruby Twist
$170
Device Type
Linx Apollo
Portable
Ruby Twist
Desktop
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Ruby Twist
450F - 650F (Recommended Range)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
Ruby Twist
0.05g - ~0.4g
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
Ruby Twist
N/A
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Ruby Twist
N/A
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Ruby Twist
72x36x108mm
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Ruby Twist
0.8kg
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Ruby Twist
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Ruby Twist
Glass
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
Choose Ruby Twist if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($170 vs $260).
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
20 differ 2 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | Ruby Twist |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $170 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | — | Convection |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 450F - 650F (Recommended Range) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.05g - ~0.4g |
| Battery Type | Internal | N/A |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | — |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | N/A |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 72x36x108mm |
| Weight | 150 grams | 0.8kg |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Glass |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | SZ Crossing |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Ball Type | — | Gem-cut rubies |
| Body Material | — | Grade 2 Titanium |
| Coil Size | — | 20mm |
| Joint Size | — | 14mm male (14-18mm adapter included) |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the Ruby Twist?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Linx Apollo is a portable, Ruby Twist is a desktop. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Twist?
Ruby Twist is the cheaper option at $170 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $90 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which is lighter, the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Twist?
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 650g less than the Ruby Twist at 0.8kg. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Is the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Twist better for home versus on-the-go use?
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Ruby Twist is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Linx Apollo or the Ruby Twist?
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the Ruby Twist uses digital (precise). Ruby Twist gives you finer per-degree control.
How much flower do the Linx Apollo and Ruby Twist hold?
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the Ruby Twist lists 0.05g - ~0.4g.
How similar are the Linx Apollo and the Ruby Twist?
Across the 22 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 20, an overlap of about 9%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.