Price (USD)
PAX 2 edgeLinx Apollo
$260
PAX 2
$150
PAX 2 is typically around $110 lower.
VS
Linx Apollo vs PAX 2
Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and PAX 2 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. PAX 2 is usually the lower-cost pick at $150, around $110 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
12
Different Specs
12
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
PortableElectronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close / ContextualLinx Apollo
—
PAX 2
<60 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
PAX 2 edgeLinx Apollo
150 grams
PAX 2
~90 grams
PAX 2 is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close / ContextualLinx Apollo
—
PAX 2
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
PAX 2
$150
Device Type
Linx Apollo
—
PAX 2
Portable
Heating Type
Linx Apollo
—
PAX 2
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Linx Apollo
—
PAX 2
<60 seconds
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
—
PAX 2
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
—
PAX 2
0.15 - 0.35 grams
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
PAX 2
3000mAh
Bluetooth / App
Linx Apollo
—
PAX 2
Yes
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
PAX 2
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
PAX 2
~90 grams
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose PAX 2 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($150 vs $260).
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward discrete and conduction sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (12 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | Linx Apollo | PAX 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $260 | $150 |
| Device Type diff | — | Portable |
| Heating Type diff | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | — | <60 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | 0.15 - 0.35 grams |
| Battery Capacity diff | 2600mAh | 3000mAh |
| Bluetooth / App diff | — | Yes |
| Dimensions diff | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight diff | 150 grams | ~90 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages | — |
| Brand diff | Linx Vapor | PAX Labs |
Comparison FAQs
Is Linx Apollo better than PAX 2?
Neither is universally better. Linx Apollo fits some priorities, while PAX 2 fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Which is cheaper: Linx Apollo or PAX 2?
PAX 2 is listed lower ($150) compared with Linx Apollo ($260), but live retailer pricing can change.
Which heats up faster between Linx Apollo and PAX 2?
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Need a Different Matchup?
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.