Price (USD)
XMAX Starry V3 edgeThe Wand
$130
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $30 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
The Wand
Ispire $130
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX $100
The Wand and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / battery swap vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry V3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $30 below The Wand. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
11%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
The Wand
$130
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $30 lower.
The Wand
Induction
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
The Wand
$130
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Heating Type
The Wand
Induction
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Temperature Range
The Wand
450°F - 800°F
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Battery Type
The Wand
Dual Replaceable 18650
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Charging
The Wand
USB-C
XMAX Starry V3
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
The Wand
Digital
XMAX Starry V3
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
The Wand
Borosilicate Glass
XMAX Starry V3
Ceramic
Brand
The Wand
Ispire
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX
Release Date
The Wand
2021
XMAX Starry V3
2019
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | The Wand | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $130 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Induction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 450°F - 800°F | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | Dual Replaceable 18650 | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | — | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Borosilicate Glass | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Ispire | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: The Wand runs induction while XMAX Starry V3 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Starry V3 is the cheaper option at $100 compared with $130 for the The Wand, about $30 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
The Wand uses induction heating, while the XMAX Starry V3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Starry V3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the The Wand is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
The Wand covers 450°F - 800°F, a wider band than the XMAX Starry V3 at 212°F - 464°F. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
The Wand charges over USB-C; the XMAX Starry V3 uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 27 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 24, an overlap of about 11%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.