Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeIspire Daab
$250
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $161 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Ispire Daab
Ispire $250
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Ispire Daab and XMAX QOMO are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $161 below Ispire Daab. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
23%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Ispire Daab
$250
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $161 lower.
Ispire Daab
Induction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Ispire Daab
$250
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Ispire Daab
Induction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Temperature Range
Ispire Daab
250°F - 800°F
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Ispire Daab
0.1g - 0.3g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Ispire Daab
Removable Dual 18650
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
Ispire Daab
2x 2900mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Ispire Daab
~60 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
Ispire Daab
2-2.5 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Ispire Daab
248x89x57mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
Ispire Daab
Digital
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Ispire Daab | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Induction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 250°F - 800°F | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.1g - 0.3g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Removable Dual 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2x 2900mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~60 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 2-2.5 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 248x89x57mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | ~472g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Borosilicate Glass | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Ispire | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the Ispire Daab is $250, a gap of about $161 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $250 for the Ispire Daab, about $161 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Ispire Daab uses induction heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Ispire Daab has the larger chamber at 0.1g - 0.3g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Ispire Daab uses removable dual 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Ispire Daab controls heat with digital, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Ispire Daab gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 2-2.5 hours on the Ispire Daab.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.