Price (USD)
Close callG Pen Hyer
$250
PAX 3
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
G Pen Hyer
Grenco Science $250
PAX 3
PAX Labs $250
G Pen Hyer and PAX 3 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $250). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
17%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
G Pen Hyer
$250
PAX 3
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
G Pen Hyer
Conduction
PAX 3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Temperature Range
G Pen Hyer
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
G Pen Hyer
~0.5g
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Battery Type
G Pen Hyer
External Battery Pack
PAX 3
Internal 18650
Battery Capacity
G Pen Hyer
6000mAh
PAX 3
3500mAh
Charging
G Pen Hyer
USB-C
PAX 3
Proprietary Dock
Charge Time
G Pen Hyer
2.5 - 3 hours
PAX 3
~90 minutes
Power Adjustment
G Pen Hyer
Digital Control - 5 Stage Modular
PAX 3
Modular - 4 stages
Chamber Material
G Pen Hyer
Ceramic
PAX 3
Stainless Steel
Brand
G Pen Hyer
Grenco Science
PAX 3
PAX Labs
Release Date
G Pen Hyer
2022
PAX 3
2016
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | G Pen Hyer | PAX 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $250 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | <0.35 grams |
| Battery Type | External Battery Pack | Internal 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 6000mAh | 3500mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~90 minutes |
| Charging | USB-C | Proprietary Dock |
| Charge Time | 2.5 - 3 hours | ~90 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | — | ~93 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control - 5 Stage Modular | Modular - 4 stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Grenco Science | PAX Labs |
| Display Type | LED Light User Interface | — |
| Haptic Feedback | No | — |
| Heating Element | Stainless Steel | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2016 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | — | 10 years |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 20 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
G Pen Hyer has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus <0.35 grams on the PAX 3. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the G Pen Hyer versus $250 for the PAX 3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
G Pen Hyer controls heat with digital control - 5 stage modular, while the PAX 3 uses modular - 4 stages. G Pen Hyer gives you finer per-degree control.
PAX 3 fully charges in ~90 minutes, ahead of 2.5 - 3 hours on the G Pen Hyer.
PAX 3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the G Pen Hyer is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.