Price (USD)
Close callG Pen Hyer
$250
PAX 3
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
G Pen Hyer
PAX 3
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
G Pen Hyer and PAX 3 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $250). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
17
Different Specs
15
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
G Pen Hyer
$250
PAX 3
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
G Pen Hyer
—
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
G Pen Hyer
—
PAX 3
~93 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
G Pen Hyer
Conduction
PAX 3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Device Type
G Pen Hyer
—
PAX 3
Portable
Heat Up Time
G Pen Hyer
—
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Temperature Range
G Pen Hyer
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
G Pen Hyer
~0.5g
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Battery Capacity
G Pen Hyer
6000mAh
PAX 3
3500mAh
Charging
G Pen Hyer
USB-C
PAX 3
—
Charge Time
G Pen Hyer
2.5 - 3 hours
PAX 3
~90 minutes
Bluetooth / App
G Pen Hyer
—
PAX 3
Yes
Dimensions
G Pen Hyer
—
PAX 3
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
G Pen Hyer
—
PAX 3
~93 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | G Pen Hyer | PAX 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $250 |
| Device Type | — | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | <0.35 grams |
| Battery Capacity | 6000mAh | 3500mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 - 3 hours | ~90 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | — | ~93 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control - 5 Stage Modular | Modular - 4 stages |
| Brand | Grenco Science | PAX Labs |
| Display Type | LED Light User Interface | — |
| Haptic Feedback | No | — |
| Heating Element | Stainless Steel | — |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 15 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
G Pen Hyer has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus <0.35 grams on the PAX 3. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the G Pen Hyer versus $250 for the PAX 3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Only the PAX 3 pairs with a companion app. The G Pen Hyer relies entirely on its on-device controls.
G Pen Hyer controls heat with digital control - 5 stage modular, while the PAX 3 uses modular - 4 stages. G Pen Hyer gives you finer per-degree control.
PAX 3 fully charges in ~90 minutes, ahead of 2.5 - 3 hours on the G Pen Hyer.
PAX 3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the G Pen Hyer is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.