Price (USD)
Close callG Pen Elite II
$250
PAX 3
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
G Pen Elite II
PAX 3
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
G Pen Elite II and PAX 3 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $250). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
18
Different Specs
15
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
17%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
G Pen Elite II
$250
PAX 3
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
G Pen Elite II
~30 seconds
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
G Pen Elite II
—
PAX 3
~93 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
G Pen Elite II
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX 3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Device Type
G Pen Elite II
—
PAX 3
Portable
Heating Type
G Pen Elite II
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX 3
Conduction
Temperature Range
G Pen Elite II
93°C - 220°C (200°F - 428°F)
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
G Pen Elite II
0.3 - 0.5 grams
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Battery Capacity
G Pen Elite II
2100mAh
PAX 3
3500mAh
Battery Life
G Pen Elite II
~1 hour of use
PAX 3
—
Charging
G Pen Elite II
USB-C
PAX 3
—
Bluetooth / App
G Pen Elite II
—
PAX 3
Yes
Dimensions
G Pen Elite II
—
PAX 3
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
G Pen Elite II
—
PAX 3
~93 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | G Pen Elite II | PAX 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $250 |
| Device Type | — | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 93°C - 220°C (200°F - 428°F) | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3 - 0.5 grams | <0.35 grams |
| Battery Capacity | 2100mAh | 3500mAh |
| Battery Life | ~1 hour of use | — |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | 90 minutes | ~90 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | — | ~93 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 4 stages |
| Brand | Grenco Science | PAX Labs |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | — |
| Display Type | High Resolution TFT (LCD) | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: G Pen Elite II runs hybrid (primarily conduction) while PAX 3 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
G Pen Elite II uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the PAX 3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
G Pen Elite II has the larger chamber at 0.3 - 0.5 grams, versus <0.35 grams on the PAX 3. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the G Pen Elite II versus $250 for the PAX 3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Only the PAX 3 pairs with a companion app. The G Pen Elite II relies entirely on its on-device controls.
Heat-up times are very close: ~30 seconds on the G Pen Elite II and <30 seconds on the PAX 3. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
G Pen Elite II controls heat with digital control, while the PAX 3 uses modular - 4 stages. G Pen Elite II gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.