Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeFrolic Thermal Extractor
$399
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $310 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Limelight $399
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Frolic Thermal Extractor and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $310 below Frolic Thermal Extractor. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $310 lower.
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Variable
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Variable
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Frolic Thermal Extractor
40°C - 240°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~0.25g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Removable 21700
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
Frolic Thermal Extractor
5000mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~13 sessions
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~1 hour 40 minutes
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Frolic Thermal Extractor
105x63x24mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Frolic Thermal Extractor | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $399 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | Variable | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 40°C - 240°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Removable 21700 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~13 sessions | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~1 hour 40 minutes | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 105x63x24mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 245g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Anodized Aluminum | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Limelight | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Both | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the Frolic Thermal Extractor is $399, a gap of about $310 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $399 for the Frolic Thermal Extractor, about $310 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Frolic Thermal Extractor uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Frolic Thermal Extractor has the larger chamber at ~0.25g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Frolic Thermal Extractor uses removable 21700, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Frolic Thermal Extractor controls heat with digital, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Frolic Thermal Extractor gives you finer per-degree control.
Frolic Thermal Extractor fully charges in ~1 hour 40 minutes, ahead of 1-2 Hours on the XMAX QOMO.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.