Price (USD)
Close callFlowermate CAP
$75
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Flowermate CAP
Flowermate $75
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Flowermate CAP and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($75 vs $89). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
16
Shared Specs
6
Overall Overlap
27%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Flowermate CAP
$75
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Flowermate CAP
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Flowermate CAP
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Flowermate CAP
$75
XMAX QOMO
$89
Temperature Range
Flowermate CAP
196℃ to 215℃
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Flowermate CAP
0.3 grams
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
Flowermate CAP
900mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Flowermate CAP
8-10 sessions
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Flowermate CAP
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Flowermate CAP
1 hour
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Flowermate CAP
30 x 93 x 20mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Chamber Material
Flowermate CAP
Stainless Steel
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Brand
Flowermate CAP
Flowermate
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Flowermate CAP | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $75 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 196℃ to 215℃ | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3 grams | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | 8-10 sessions | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1 hour | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 30 x 93 x 20mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 90 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 3 stages | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Flowermate | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 16 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Flowermate CAP has the larger chamber at 0.3 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $75 for the Flowermate CAP versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Heat-up times are very close: ~20 seconds on the Flowermate CAP and ~20 seconds on the XMAX QOMO. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Flowermate CAP fully charges in 1 hour, ahead of 1-2 Hours on the XMAX QOMO.
Flowermate CAP is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Flowermate CAP's spec sheet lists 8-10 sessions; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.