Price (USD)
Flowermate Aura edgeFlowermate Aura
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
Flowermate Aura is typically around $24 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Flowermate Aura
Flowermate $65
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Flowermate Aura and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Flowermate Aura is usually the lower-cost pick at $65, around $24 below XMAX QOMO. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
21%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Flowermate Aura
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
Flowermate Aura is typically around $24 lower.
Flowermate Aura
~60 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Flowermate Aura
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Flowermate Aura
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heat Up Time
Flowermate Aura
~60 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Flowermate Aura
40 - 230°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Battery Capacity
Flowermate Aura
2600mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Flowermate Aura
~2 hours
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
Flowermate Aura
3-4 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Flowermate Aura
14.7 x 2.8 cm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
Flowermate Aura
Digital (precise)
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Brand
Flowermate Aura
Flowermate
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Release Date
Flowermate Aura
2016
XMAX QOMO
2020
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Flowermate Aura | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 40 - 230°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~2 hours | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 14.7 x 2.8 cm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | ~103g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Flowermate | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | OLED | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the XMAX QOMO is ready in ~20 seconds versus ~60 seconds on the Flowermate Aura, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
Flowermate Aura is the cheaper option at $65 compared with $89 for the XMAX QOMO, about $24 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Flowermate Aura takes ~60 seconds. That's roughly 40 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Flowermate Aura controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Flowermate Aura gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Flowermate Aura.
Flowermate Aura is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Flowermate Aura's spec sheet lists ~2 hours; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.