Price (USD)
Close callFlowermate Aura
$65
XMAX Daboo
$49
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Flowermate Aura
Flowermate $65
XMAX Daboo
XMAX $49
Flowermate Aura and XMAX Daboo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $49). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
30
Different Specs
27
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
10%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Flowermate Aura
$65
XMAX Daboo
$49
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Flowermate Aura
~103g
XMAX Daboo
~231g
Flowermate Aura is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Flowermate Aura
$65
XMAX Daboo
$49
Temperature Range
Flowermate Aura
40 - 230°C
XMAX Daboo
285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F)
Battery Capacity
Flowermate Aura
2600mAh
XMAX Daboo
650mAh
Charge Time
Flowermate Aura
3-4 hours
XMAX Daboo
~1 Hour
Dimensions
Flowermate Aura
14.7 x 2.8 cm
XMAX Daboo
166.5x38.5x22mm
Weight
Flowermate Aura
~103g
XMAX Daboo
~231g
Power Adjustment
Flowermate Aura
Digital (precise)
XMAX Daboo
Modular - 3 Stages
Brand
Flowermate Aura
Flowermate
XMAX Daboo
XMAX
Session Style
Flowermate Aura
Session
XMAX Daboo
Both
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Flowermate Aura | XMAX Daboo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $49 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 40 - 230°C | 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | N/A |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 650mAh |
| Battery Life | ~2 hours | — |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | ~1 Hour |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 14.7 x 2.8 cm | 166.5x38.5x22mm |
| Weight | ~103g | ~231g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | — |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Flowermate | XMAX |
| 510 Compatible | — | Yes |
| Cartridge Resistance Support | — | 0.5-2.0Ω |
| Coil Type | — | Porous Quartz Coil |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | OLED | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Operating Voltage | — | 3.3-4.2V |
| Recommended Charger | — | 5V/1A |
| Release Date | 2016 | — |
| Session Style | Session | Both |
| Warranty | — | 6 months |
| Water Filtration | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is portability: the Flowermate Aura is roughly 128g lighter than the XMAX Daboo, which adds up over a day of pocket carry.
Flowermate Aura is the lighter unit at ~103g, around 128g less than the XMAX Daboo at ~231g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Listed prices are close: $65 for the Flowermate Aura versus $49 for the XMAX Daboo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Flowermate Aura controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX Daboo uses modular - 3 stages. Flowermate Aura gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX Daboo fully charges in ~1 Hour, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Flowermate Aura.
Flowermate Aura is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Daboo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Flowermate Aura covers 40 - 230°C, a wider band than the XMAX Daboo at 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.