Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeFENiX Pro
$135
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $46 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX Pro
FENiX $135
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
FENiX Pro and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $46 below FENiX Pro. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
18%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
FENiX Pro
$135
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $46 lower.
FENiX Pro
~25 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
FENiX Pro
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX Pro
$135
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
FENiX Pro
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
FENiX Pro
~25 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
FENiX Pro
160°C - 221°C (320°F - 430°F)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
FENiX Pro
0.2 - 0.3 grams
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
FENiX Pro
2300 mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Charging
FENiX Pro
Micro-USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
FENiX Pro
2 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
FENiX Pro
5.2x2.5x8.4cm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
FENiX Pro
Digital (precise)
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | FENiX Pro | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $135 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~25 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 160°C - 221°C (320°F - 430°F) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2 - 0.3 grams | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2300 mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro-USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 2 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 5.2x2.5x8.4cm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | FENiX | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | OLED | — |
| Manufacturer | South Reed Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: FENiX Pro runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $135 for the FENiX Pro, about $46 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the FENiX Pro takes ~25 seconds. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
FENiX Pro uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
FENiX Pro has the larger chamber at 0.2 - 0.3 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
FENiX Pro controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. FENiX Pro gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 2 hours on the FENiX Pro.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.