Price (USD)
Close callFENiX Mini
$95
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX Mini
FENiX $95
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
FENiX Mini and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($95 vs $89). XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
23%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
FENiX Mini
$95
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
FENiX Mini
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
FENiX Mini
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX Mini
$95
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
FENiX Mini
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
FENiX Mini
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
FENiX Mini
160°C - 221°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Battery Type
FENiX Mini
Internal 18500
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
FENiX Mini
1600mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
FENiX Mini
<50 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
FENiX Mini
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
FENiX Mini
<2 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
FENiX Mini
80x25x50mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | FENiX Mini | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $95 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 160°C - 221°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.15g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal 18500 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1600mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | <50 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | <2 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 80x25x50mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 135 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | FENiX | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Manufacturer | South Reed Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: FENiX Mini runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the FENiX Mini takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
FENiX Mini uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $95 for the FENiX Mini versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
FENiX Mini controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. FENiX Mini gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of <2 hours on the FENiX Mini.
FENiX Mini is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.