Price (USD)
XMAX Starry V3 edgeFENiX 2.0
$129
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $29 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
FENiX 2.0
XMAX Starry V3
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX 2.0 and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry V3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $29 below FENiX 2.0. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
18
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
6%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
FENiX 2.0
$129
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $29 lower.
FENiX 2.0
<30 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
XMAX Starry V3
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
FENiX 2.0
Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0
$129
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Device Type
FENiX 2.0
Portable
XMAX Starry V3
—
Heating Type
FENiX 2.0
Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Temperature Range
FENiX 2.0
—
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Battery Type
FENiX 2.0
—
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Capacity
FENiX 2.0
4400 mAh
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Battery Life
FENiX 2.0
—
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Charging
FENiX 2.0
—
XMAX Starry V3
Micro USB
Charge Time
FENiX 2.0
2.5 hours
XMAX Starry V3
90-120 minutes
Pass-Through Charging
FENiX 2.0
—
XMAX Starry V3
Yes
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | FENiX 2.0 | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $129 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 212°F - 464°F |
| Battery Type | — | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 4400 mAh | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | — | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | ~232 grams | — |
| Chamber Material | Removable titanium | Ceramic |
| Display Type | 0.95 inch OLED | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | South Reed Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: FENiX 2.0 runs convection while XMAX Starry V3 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Starry V3 is the cheaper option at $100 compared with $129 for the FENiX 2.0, about $29 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
FENiX 2.0 uses convection heating, while the XMAX Starry V3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Yes, only the XMAX Starry V3 supports pass-through charging. The FENiX 2.0 has to finish charging before you can use it.
Heat-up times are very close: <30 seconds on the FENiX 2.0 and ~30 seconds on the XMAX Starry V3. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
XMAX Starry V3 fully charges in 90-120 minutes, ahead of 2.5 hours on the FENiX 2.0.
XMAX Starry V3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the FENiX 2.0 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.