Price (USD)
XMAX Starry V3 edgeFENiX 2.0
$129
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $29 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX 2.0
FENiX $129
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX $100
FENiX 2.0 and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry V3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $29 below FENiX 2.0. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
6
Overall Overlap
23%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
FENiX 2.0
$129
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $29 lower.
FENiX 2.0
<30 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
XMAX Starry V3
120g
XMAX Starry V3 is the lighter listed unit.
FENiX 2.0
Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0
$129
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Heating Type
FENiX 2.0
Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Temperature Range
FENiX 2.0
160°C - 221°C (320°F - 430°F)
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Battery Type
FENiX 2.0
Internal
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Capacity
FENiX 2.0
4400 mAh
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Battery Life
FENiX 2.0
~75 minutes
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Charge Time
FENiX 2.0
2.5 hours
XMAX Starry V3
90-120 minutes
Dimensions
FENiX 2.0
110x60x30mm
XMAX Starry V3
11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm
Weight
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
XMAX Starry V3
120g
Chamber Material
FENiX 2.0
Removable titanium
XMAX Starry V3
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | FENiX 2.0 | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $129 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 160°C - 221°C (320°F - 430°F) | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 4400 mAh | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | ~75 minutes | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 110x60x30mm | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | ~232 grams | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Removable titanium | Ceramic |
| Brand | FENiX | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | 0.95 inch OLED | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | South Reed Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: FENiX 2.0 runs convection while XMAX Starry V3 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Starry V3 is the cheaper option at $100 compared with $129 for the FENiX 2.0, about $29 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
FENiX 2.0 uses convection heating, while the XMAX Starry V3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Starry V3 is the lighter unit at 120g, around 112g less than the FENiX 2.0 at ~232 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
FENiX 2.0 is rated for ~75 minutes, ahead of 60-80 minutes on the XMAX Starry V3. Real-world battery life depends on how high you set the temperature and how long sessions run.
XMAX Starry V3 uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The FENiX 2.0 has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Heat-up times are very close: <30 seconds on the FENiX 2.0 and ~30 seconds on the XMAX Starry V3. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.