Price (USD)
Close callFENiX 2.0
$129
PAX Plus
$125
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
FENiX 2.0
PAX Plus
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX 2.0 and PAX Plus are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($129 vs $125). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
17
Different Specs
15
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
FENiX 2.0
$129
PAX Plus
$125
Pricing is very close between both devices.
FENiX 2.0
<30 seconds
PAX Plus
<30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
PAX Plus
91 grams
PAX Plus is the lighter listed unit.
FENiX 2.0
Convection
PAX Plus
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0
$129
PAX Plus
$125
Heating Type
FENiX 2.0
Convection
PAX Plus
Conduction
Chamber Capacity
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX Plus
0.25g - 0.5g
Battery Capacity
FENiX 2.0
4400 mAh
PAX Plus
3300mAh (internal)
Charge Time
FENiX 2.0
2.5 hours
PAX Plus
—
Dimensions
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX Plus
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
PAX Plus
91 grams
Brand
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX Plus
PAX Labs
Chamber Material
FENiX 2.0
Removable titanium
PAX Plus
—
Charging
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX Plus
Magnetic dock via USB, under ~120 minutes
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | FENiX 2.0 | PAX Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $129 | $125 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | <30 seconds |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.25g - 0.5g |
| Battery Capacity | 4400 mAh | 3300mAh (internal) |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | — |
| Dimensions | — | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | ~232 grams | 91 grams |
| Brand | — | PAX Labs |
| Chamber Material | Removable titanium | — |
| Charging | — | Magnetic dock via USB, under ~120 minutes |
| Concentrates | — | Supports concentrate insert (Complete Kit) |
| Display Type | 0.95 inch OLED | — |
| Manufacturer | South Reed Technology Co | — |
| Run Time | — | Up to ~120 minutes on lower modes |
| Temperature Control | — | Stealth, Efficiency, Flavor, Boost modes |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: FENiX 2.0 runs convection while PAX Plus runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
FENiX 2.0 uses convection heating, while the PAX Plus uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
PAX Plus is the lighter unit at 91 grams, around 141g less than the FENiX 2.0 at ~232 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Listed prices are close: $129 for the FENiX 2.0 versus $125 for the PAX Plus. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Heat-up times are very close: <30 seconds on the FENiX 2.0 and <30 seconds on the PAX Plus. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
PAX Plus is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the FENiX 2.0 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Across the 17 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 15, an overlap of about 12%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.