Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0 edgeFENiX 2.0
$129
PAX 3
$250
FENiX 2.0 is typically around $121 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
FENiX 2.0
PAX 3
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX 2.0 and PAX 3 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. FENiX 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $129, around $121 below PAX 3. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
16
Different Specs
14
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
FENiX 2.0
$129
PAX 3
$250
FENiX 2.0 is typically around $121 lower.
FENiX 2.0
<30 seconds
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
PAX 3
~93 grams
PAX 3 is the lighter listed unit.
FENiX 2.0
Convection
PAX 3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0
$129
PAX 3
$250
Heating Type
FENiX 2.0
Convection
PAX 3
Conduction
Temperature Range
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Battery Capacity
FENiX 2.0
4400 mAh
PAX 3
3500mAh
Charge Time
FENiX 2.0
2.5 hours
PAX 3
~90 minutes
Bluetooth / App
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX 3
Yes
Dimensions
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX 3
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
PAX 3
~93 grams
Power Adjustment
FENiX 2.0
—
PAX 3
Modular - 4 stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | FENiX 2.0 | PAX 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $129 | $250 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | <0.35 grams |
| Battery Capacity | 4400 mAh | 3500mAh |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | ~90 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | ~232 grams | ~93 grams |
| Power Adjustment | — | Modular - 4 stages |
| Brand | — | PAX Labs |
| Chamber Material | Removable titanium | — |
| Display Type | 0.95 inch OLED | — |
| Manufacturer | South Reed Technology Co | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the FENiX 2.0 sits at $129 while the PAX 3 is $250, a gap of about $121 that puts them in different buying brackets.
FENiX 2.0 is the cheaper option at $129 compared with $250 for the PAX 3, about $121 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
FENiX 2.0 uses convection heating, while the PAX 3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
PAX 3 is the lighter unit at ~93 grams, around 139g less than the FENiX 2.0 at ~232 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Only the PAX 3 pairs with a companion app. The FENiX 2.0 relies entirely on its on-device controls.
Heat-up times are very close: <30 seconds on the FENiX 2.0 and <30 seconds on the PAX 3. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
PAX 3 fully charges in ~90 minutes, ahead of 2.5 hours on the FENiX 2.0.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.