Price (USD)
XMAX Starry 4 edgeXL E-Nano
$280
XMAX Starry 4
$99
XMAX Starry 4 is typically around $181 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XL E-Nano
Epickai $280
XMAX Starry 4
XMAX $99
XL E-Nano and XMAX Starry 4 solve similar use-cases with different tradeoffs. XMAX Starry 4 is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $181 below XL E-Nano. XMAX Starry 4 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
28
Different Specs
28
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XL E-Nano
$280
XMAX Starry 4
$99
XMAX Starry 4 is typically around $181 lower.
XL E-Nano
2 Minutes
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
XMAX Starry 4 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
XL E-Nano
~188g
XMAX Starry 4
~137g
XMAX Starry 4 is the lighter listed unit.
XL E-Nano
Convection
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XL E-Nano
$280
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Device Type
XL E-Nano
Desktop
XMAX Starry 4
Portable
Heating Type
XL E-Nano
Convection
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Heat Up Time
XL E-Nano
2 Minutes
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
XL E-Nano
0-560°F
XMAX Starry 4
100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉)
Chamber Capacity
XL E-Nano
0.2g
XMAX Starry 4
0.4g
Battery Type
XL E-Nano
N/A
XMAX Starry 4
18650
Charging
XL E-Nano
N/A
XMAX Starry 4
USB-C
Dimensions
XL E-Nano
108x50mm
XMAX Starry 4
115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm
Weight
XL E-Nano
~188g
XMAX Starry 4
~137g
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XL E-Nano | XMAX Starry 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $280 | $99 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 2 Minutes | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 0-560°F | 100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2g | 0.4g |
| Battery Type | N/A | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2550mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~90 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 108x50mm | 115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm |
| Weight | ~188g | ~137g |
| Power Adjustment | Rotary Knob | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Brand | Epickai | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Power Cable Length | 2.5 Metres | — |
| Power Source | AC Power (110v) | — |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Starry 4 sits at $99 while the XL E-Nano is $280, a gap of about $181 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Starry 4 is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $280 for the XL E-Nano, about $181 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Starry 4 reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the XL E-Nano takes 2 Minutes. That's roughly 105 seconds quicker on the XMAX Starry 4, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
XL E-Nano uses convection heating, while the XMAX Starry 4 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Starry 4 has the larger chamber at 0.4g, versus 0.2g on the XL E-Nano. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX Starry 4 is the lighter unit at ~137g, around 51g less than the XL E-Nano at ~188g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
XMAX Starry 4 is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the XL E-Nano is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.