Price (USD)
OG E-Nano edgeOG E-Nano
$200
PAX 3
$250
OG E-Nano is typically around $50 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
OG E-Nano vs PAX 3
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
OG E-Nano
Epickai $200
VS
PAX 3
PAX Labs $250
Editorial Summary
OG E-Nano and PAX 3 solve similar use-cases with different tradeoffs. OG E-Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $200, around $50 below PAX 3. PAX 3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
PAX 3 edgeOG E-Nano
2 Minutes
PAX 3
<30 seconds
PAX 3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Weight
PAX 3 edgeOG E-Nano
~113g
PAX 3
~93 grams
PAX 3 is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close callOG E-Nano
Convection
PAX 3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
OG E-Nano
$200
PAX 3
$250
Device Type
OG E-Nano
Desktop
PAX 3
Portable
Heating Type
OG E-Nano
Convection
PAX 3
Conduction
Heat Up Time
OG E-Nano
2 Minutes
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Temperature Range
OG E-Nano
0-560°F
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
OG E-Nano
~0.25g
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Battery Type
OG E-Nano
N/A
PAX 3
Internal 18650
Charging
OG E-Nano
N/A
PAX 3
Proprietary Dock
Dimensions
OG E-Nano
95x51x51mm
PAX 3
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
OG E-Nano
~113g
PAX 3
~93 grams
Choose OG E-Nano if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($200 vs $250).
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
Choose PAX 3 if...
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and conduction sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
23 differ 0 shared
| Specification | OG E-Nano | PAX 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $200 | $250 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 2 Minutes | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 0-560°F | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | <0.35 grams |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 3500mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~90 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | Proprietary Dock |
| Charge Time | — | ~90 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 95x51x51mm | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | ~113g | ~93 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Rotary Knob | Modular - 4 stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Epickai | PAX Labs |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | — |
| Power Cable Length | 2.5 Metres | — |
| Power Source | AC Power (110v) | — |
| Release Date | — | 2016 |
| Warranty | 3 years | 10 years |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the OG E-Nano and the PAX 3?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. OG E-Nano is a desktop, PAX 3 is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which is cheaper, the OG E-Nano or the PAX 3?
OG E-Nano is the cheaper option at $200 compared with $250 for the PAX 3, about $50 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the OG E-Nano or the PAX 3?
PAX 3 reaches session-ready temperature in <30 seconds, while the OG E-Nano takes 2 Minutes. That's roughly 90 seconds quicker on the PAX 3, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the OG E-Nano and the PAX 3?
OG E-Nano uses convection heating, while the PAX 3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Does the OG E-Nano or the PAX 3 hold more flower?
PAX 3 has the larger chamber at <0.35 grams, versus ~0.25g on the OG E-Nano. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Which is lighter, the OG E-Nano or the PAX 3?
PAX 3 is the lighter unit at ~93 grams, around 20g less than the OG E-Nano at ~113g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Is the OG E-Nano or the PAX 3 better for home versus on-the-go use?
PAX 3 is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the OG E-Nano is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.