Price (USD)
Close callDynavap M+
$89
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Dynavap M+
DynaVap $89
XMAX Starry 4
XMAX $99
Dynavap M+ and XMAX Starry 4 are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($89 vs $99). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
28
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
11%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Dynavap M+
$89
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Dynavap M+
Depending on the heat source, ~20 seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Dynavap M+
Hybrid
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Dynavap M+
$89
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Heating Type
Dynavap M+
Hybrid
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Dynavap M+
Depending on the heat source, ~20 seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
Dynavap M+
230°C - 250°C
XMAX Starry 4
100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉)
Chamber Capacity
Dynavap M+
~0.1g
XMAX Starry 4
0.4g
Battery Type
Dynavap M+
None
XMAX Starry 4
18650
Battery Capacity
Dynavap M+
N/A
XMAX Starry 4
2550mAh
Battery Life
Dynavap M+
N/A
XMAX Starry 4
~60 minutes
Charging
Dynavap M+
N/A
XMAX Starry 4
USB-C
Charge Time
Dynavap M+
N/A
XMAX Starry 4
~90 minutes
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Dynavap M+ | XMAX Starry 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $89 | $99 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | Depending on the heat source, ~20 seconds | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 230°C - 250°C | 100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.1g | 0.4g |
| Battery Type | None | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 2550mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | N/A | ~90 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm |
| Weight | — | ~137g |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Brand | DynaVap | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Body Material | Mostly stainless steel & high heat silicone seals | — |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Length | 92mm | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Dynavap M+ runs hybrid while XMAX Starry 4 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Starry 4 reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the Dynavap M+ takes Depending on the heat source, ~20 seconds. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the XMAX Starry 4, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Dynavap M+ uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX Starry 4 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Starry 4 has the larger chamber at 0.4g, versus ~0.1g on the Dynavap M+. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $89 for the Dynavap M+ versus $99 for the XMAX Starry 4. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Starry 4 uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Dynavap M+ has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Dynavap M+ controls heat with manual, while the XMAX Starry 4 uses digital (precise). XMAX Starry 4 gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.