Price (USD)
Close callDryonic II
$95
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Dryonic II
O2VAPE $95
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX $100
Dryonic II and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($95 vs $100). XMAX Starry V3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
15%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Dryonic II
$95
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Dryonic II
<50 Seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
XMAX Starry V3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Dryonic II
Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Dryonic II
$95
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Heating Type
Dryonic II
Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Dryonic II
<50 Seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
Dryonic II
200-430°F
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Chamber Capacity
Dryonic II
<0.5g
XMAX Starry V3
0.3g
Battery Capacity
Dryonic II
1200mAh
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Battery Life
Dryonic II
~1 hour
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Power Adjustment
Dryonic II
Digital - 5 degree incriments
XMAX Starry V3
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Dryonic II
Quartz
XMAX Starry V3
Ceramic
Brand
Dryonic II
O2VAPE
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Dryonic II | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $95 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <50 Seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 200-430°F | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | <0.5g | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | — | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | ~1 hour | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | Micro-USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | — | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital - 5 degree incriments | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Ceramic |
| Brand | O2VAPE | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | OLED | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | O2VAPE | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Dryonic II runs convection while XMAX Starry V3 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Starry V3 reaches session-ready temperature in ~30 seconds, while the Dryonic II takes <50 Seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX Starry V3, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Dryonic II uses convection heating, while the XMAX Starry V3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Dryonic II has the larger chamber at <0.5g, versus 0.3g on the XMAX Starry V3. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX Starry V3 is rated for 60-80 minutes, ahead of ~1 hour on the Dryonic II. Real-world battery life depends on how high you set the temperature and how long sessions run.
Listed prices are close: $95 for the Dryonic II versus $100 for the XMAX Starry V3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Across the 26 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 22, an overlap of about 15%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.