Price (USD)
Close callDeezy
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Deezy
The Kind Pen $99
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Deezy and XMAX QOMO are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($99 vs $89). XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
17%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Deezy
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Deezy
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Deezy
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Deezy
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heat Up Time
Deezy
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Deezy
302°F - 437°F (150°C - 225°C)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Deezy
~0.3 grams
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
Deezy
1100mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Charging
Deezy
Micro-USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Dimensions
Deezy
4 x 2.5 x 2.5 inches
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
Deezy
Digital (precise)
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Brand
Deezy
The Kind Pen
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Warranty
Deezy
Lifetime
XMAX QOMO
1 year
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Deezy | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 302°F - 437°F (150°C - 225°C) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.3 grams | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | — | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1100mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro-USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 4 x 2.5 x 2.5 inches | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | The Kind Pen | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | OLED | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 19 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Deezy takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Deezy has the larger chamber at ~0.3 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $99 for the Deezy versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Deezy controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Deezy gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO charges over USB-C; the Deezy uses a Micro-USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 23 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 19, an overlap of about 17%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.